According to Kant, we should look at our maxims, or intentions, of the particular action. In other words, humans are free rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for the enjoyment or happiness of another. On the other hand, Utilitarians believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. The problem with this, however, is that it could involve using people as mere means and may lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.
Additionally, promises, which are typically binding in our society, can be broken if it produces a greater good.
This can be applied to any promise, including those made with loved ones. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Philosophy What is the difference between kantianism and utilitarianism?
Ben Davis August 31, What is the difference between kantianism and utilitarianism? What is the relationship between utilitarianism and kantianism? Is Utilitarianism a virtue ethics?
What are the similarities between deontology and utilitarianism? Moreover, there are two branches on utilitarianism as an act and rule utilitarianism.
Thus, this is the fundamental difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is a teleological theory. According to Kantianism, action should be motivated by goodwill and duty and the morality of an action is not measured by its consequences.
However, according to utilitarianism, an action is considered moral and good if it results in providing greater happiness for others, regardless of its intention; hence an action is measured by its consequences. Hence, this is another difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Kantianism and Utilitarianism are ethical philosophies that give moral guidance to individual actions and decisions. Both of these theories were introduced during the 18 th century. However, these two diverge in their focus.
Accordingly, the main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. Vleeschauwer, Herman Jean de. In simple words, virtues ethics looks at the moral character or virtue of a character of the person carrying out an action, instead of the action itself, or the consequences of an action.
Thus, this theory deals with the rightness or wrongness of individual actions and describes the characteristics and behaviours a virtuous or good person will seek to achieve. In brief, virtue ethics urges people to live a moral life by practice virtuous habits. According to many virtue theorists, all human beings would benefit from a common set of virtues.
Furthermore, virtue ethics is a very useful theory since most people are often interested in assessing the moral character of individuals rather than assessing the rightness or wrongness of a particular action.
However, it is also important to note that although virtue ethics provide general guidance on how to become a virtuous person, it does not specify actions to take in moral dilemmas. According to this theory, an action is right, if it tends to promote happiness — not just the happiness of the person who performs the action, but all those who are affected by that action.
0コメント